Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilbert
I feel this thread was settled when all the people who were arguing the Megadrive was more powerful than the CD32 quickly (not talking about roondar) ran to the SF2 thread to show off their knowledge as to how even the standard AGA Amiga could do a much better version of that game than the Megadrive! Like I said the people calling others trolls - *always* are the trolls themselves.
|
People have shown that a much more faithful conversion is possible on the Amiga (not 1:1 conversion, we should be clear about that)
Why does it make the Amiga or CD32 now more powerful than a Megadrive now ?
No one said that a "standard AGA Amiga could do a much better version of that game than the Megadrive" generally.
Even when it could be better than the EXISTING, CURRENT AVAILABLE version for the Megadrive, you can't assume the Megadrive port the best version possible on the console.
Some decent Megadrive coders could also do a "proof of concept" and develop a better version than currently available.
So there's no proof in the SF2 thread that the Amiga is better than the Megadrive. Just your subjective opinion assuming the Megadrive version being the best result possible on the console and comparing this to mcgeezer's proof of concept.
Other way around FACTS are known about the internals and features of the Megadrive. And those have been brought up here.
So the SF2 thread doesn't change a thing and doesn't make the Amiga or CD32 now magically smash the Megadrive
.