|
Libraries, programs, etc. sometimes come in 68000, 68020, and 68040 versions, but I've never seen a 68030-specific version of anything. This would appear to support the arguments from killergorilla and Chuckles, in that if the 030 is indeed just a faster 020 then there would be no need to compile a separate 030 version. If I'm making any sense!
But until reading this thread, I was wondering about the lack of an 030 option myself. You learn something new every day!
Steve.
|