Quote:
Any difference if you boot using WB 3.1 disk? (with required lib copied to libs: )
|
I have a plain OS 3.1 installation on WinUAE and it shows the very same result. I get:
Code:
{
"inttable": [
1,
2,
3.0000000000000004,
4,
5
]
}
My CPU/FPU settings for the test are attached to this post.
Quote:
Do you get same behavior when you select 64-bit FPU? And do you get different or same results as above?
|
No, with a 64-bit FPU I get different results. In that case the values are even more off. This is the result with Host (64-bit) mode:
Code:
{
"inttable": [
1.0000000000000004,
2.0000000000000008,
3.0000000000000013,
4.0000000000000017,
5.0000000000000017
]
}