Hi there,
I've been wondering what are the actual difference in performance between the different zorro buses (inkluding fast Zorro II, which is supposedly ZorroIIx2). I've never had a machine with Zorro III but I understand it's bandwith is about the same as
VLB, while Zorro II's bandwith is a little less then ISA (which I find surprising).
Does anyone know, or have measured, how the difference in bandwith effect the performance of cards (such as Cybervision 64/3D)? It might be difficult to create an "all-things-being-equal" situation when going from one bus to another as a Zorro II and Zorro III machine will be so different in so many ways, but lets say an A1200/60 with a Zorro II busboard, then in fast-zorro II mode, then an A4000/60 on the Zorro III bus.
Does a Cybervision saturate the Zorro II bus? Would it saturate it in fast-mode as well? Is there really any point in buying an RTG-card for the zorro bus in a machine that could potentially work with a PCI card?
That's just for graphics. I understand that few SCSI cards were made for Zorro III and that the PCI SCSI cards that work with mediator busboards are for some reason capped at about 4mb transfer-rates, but what about other expansion cards like sound/music, videoediting and ethernet?