View Single Post
Old 30 January 2018, 09:41   #2124
Amiga68k
Registered User

Amiga68k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 144
Hi Peter, not stumbled into any issues with this version yet I do have a question though.

What is the reasoning behind the 'different approach' of using the version string? I notice that the 3 last digits are part of the lib_IdString, but are missing in the lib_Version value. Output from the shell always displays 46.4 in this case. Or will this be bumped to 46.5 or something when you are happy with the result?

Examples:
Code:
6.Ram Disk:> version scsi.device full
scsi.device 43.45 (05/13/2008)
6.Ram Disk:> version exec.library full
exec.library 45.20 (01/06/2002)
6.Ram Disk:> version icon.library full
icon.library 46.4
(68020)
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	icon.library.png
Views:	56
Size:	4.4 KB
ID:	56526  
Amiga68k is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03943 seconds with 11 queries