View Single Post
Old 19 January 2018, 08:07   #56
LaBodilsen
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Denmark
Posts: 179
Quote:
Originally Posted by britelite View Post
The usual preview is available here
I've had a change to view the new preview, and the speed is simply amazing. But i'm not particular fond of the mipmap artifacts, as it really degrades the visual quality.

Would it make much of a performance difference if the mipmaping was done differently. Instead of upscaling the smaller levels, then down scale to the next mipmap level, and then compensate the performance loss by using longwords where possible.

ex: for wall height between 64-33 use the fullsize texture, for 32-17 use first mipmap level texture and for 16-0 use lowest mipmap level texture. (hope i make sence)

i would'nt mind if i had to manually hand optimize every wall height below 64 pixels, as it's no more than 32 code segments.
LaBodilsen is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.06788 seconds with 11 queries