View Single Post
Old 19 February 2017, 15:22   #33
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: moon
Posts: 349
Originally Posted by idrougge View Post
the tried and true methods of cracking has served its purpose of preservation well
I strongly disagree, as having a cracked version of a game does not preserve the unmodified original at all. Lots of cracks were poorly done and had bugs, or stuff left out because of disk space, and lots of the circulated floppies (and subsequent ADF files added to TOSEC) have minor data corruption "thanks" to X-Copy's idiotic doscopy+ mode which conceals read errors by recalculating the checksum from the corrupt data. Is that how we want Amiga software remembered? Some of the worst cracks have been redone in recent years, probably from original disks that were luckily still available.

Originally Posted by idrougge View Post
IPF images are quite useless if you want to play a game or run an application.
How can it be useless? The whole point of an IPF image is to document the content of the original disk with enough detail to be indistinguishable! It renders a crack superfluous, except for parts unrelated to disk access, like manual checks.
absence is offline  
Page generated in 0.04050 seconds with 10 queries