View Single Post
Old 16 January 2017, 18:30   #108
Unregistered User
demolition's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Copenhagen / DK
Age: 38
Posts: 3,706
Originally Posted by Pat the Cat View Post
They put the information out without testing it as "the authoritative, final word". If it was wrong, they did not test it, and if they did not test it without making such claims, then the claims were unwarranted, and yes, it was fraud. Not by commission, but by omission. They did not check their facts.
The reason for that is that the documentation had to be available more or less at the same time as the hardware release, thus it had to be written while the hardware was still being developed. This makes it quite a lot harder to write the documentation since you have to document stuff that doesn't fully exist yet.
demolition is offline  
Page generated in 0.03923 seconds with 10 queries