View Single Post
Old 25 June 2016, 23:42   #23
Code Kitten

Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Montreal/Canadia
Age: 46
Posts: 1,016
Originally Posted by Amigajay View Post
I like watching the dif ports as long as people get the facts about the machines running them.
I.e to compare a 99 computer I.e Speccy against a 2500-3000 dev machine i.e the Sharp X68000 is like comparing a Ford Fiesta to a Jaguar
He compares how well each port addresses:
- the target platform
- the original arcade gameplay

This is perfectly acceptable, regardless of the systems. "Is the port worth playing?" is the question he answers and the hardware does not matter there. I am not sure why you think he is ignoring the differences between each system. He does take them explicitly into account.

Originally Posted by Amigajay View Post
That along with home computer ports esp ineurope had teams of 1-3 and dev times of 3-9 months, compared to 20+ and 12-18 months for Japanese console/computer versions, as long as these facts are present its more fair to compare, what and why things went wrong in some versions rather than the
hardware was not up to the task in a lot of cases.
He does not put the fault on the hardware but on the developers so I am not sure what you are referring to?

He does mention explicitly several times that good developers are essential to a good port and regularly praises even Spectrum ports when they are good so your point seems most weird. Again, what are you referring to?
ReadOnlyCat is offline  
Page generated in 0.16040 seconds with 9 queries