View Single Post
Old 21 May 2016, 13:53   #67
Registered User

Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Sweden
Age: 34
Posts: 13
Send a message via MSN to SMF
Originally Posted by ThomasCGX View Post
found part of the Picasso source and sorry to say: I did remember incorrectly: it was 93
if I read this correctly, not 96. Sorry about that. So now I have no idea what this
'Picasso96' actually is, probably someone disasm'ed the original since it was easier
to do than CGX and built upon this ?
It sound's highly unlikely that "Thomas" would not know what Picasso96 is since it was the only competing product to CGFX and we all know how big the egos is in every camp and throwing mud at each other is what we do best. But go ahead and release the sources.
SMF is offline  
Page generated in 0.08025 seconds with 9 queries