Originally Posted by ThomasCGX
found part of the Picasso source and sorry to say: I did remember incorrectly: it was 93
if I read this correctly, not 96. Sorry about that. So now I have no idea what this
'Picasso96' actually is, probably someone disasm'ed the original since it was easier
to do than CGX and built upon this ?
It sound's highly unlikely that "Thomas" would not know what Picasso96 is since it was the only competing product to CGFX and we all know how big the egos is in every camp and throwing mud at each other is what we do best. But go ahead and release the sources.