View Single Post
Old 20 May 2016, 15:01   #34
ThomasCGX
 
Posts: n/a
found part of the Picasso source and sorry to say: I did remember incorrectly: it was 93
if I read this correctly, not 96. Sorry about that. So now I have no idea what this
'Picasso96' actually is, probably someone disasm'ed the original since it was easier
to do than CGX and built upon this ?
 
 
Page generated in 0.04622 seconds with 9 queries