View Single Post
Old 24 February 2016, 09:42   #40
britelite
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Espoo / Finland
Posts: 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by eXeler0 View Post
But that's the thing with Apollo-core isn't it.. it may still be a bit rough around the edges but the goal *is* to make it the most compatible 68k CPU to date and the fact that it exists in an FPGA allows the devs to hunt down issues for years ahead..
Yes, but adding all these useless extended features are bound to break compatibility (not necessarily at cpu-level, but in general). Which is why I'd rather see them implement a pure accelerator first without any kind of additional crap added, but making sure it could actually serve as a replacement for an 060-card (as in, it would actually run ALL existing 060 software).
britelite is online now  
 
Page generated in 0.05615 seconds with 9 queries