View Single Post
Old 12 October 2015, 09:38   #60
Toni Wilen
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 20,660
Same answer: Don't do it. There is nothing to fix.

Don't use fast 68020+ cycle-exact, it is pointless, you only get huge CPU usage without being accurate.
EDIT: 68040/060 does not have this problem because it is not internally cycle-exact like 68020 and 68030. Only memory accesses are cycle-exact (DMA contention is emulated).

EDIT2: Thanks for reminding, I was supposed to add optional memory cycle counting only -"cycle exact" mode for 68000-68030 CPUs long time ago...

Last edited by Toni Wilen; 12 October 2015 at 20:58.
Toni Wilen is offline  
Page generated in 0.04862 seconds with 9 queries