View Single Post
Old 20 August 2015, 16:14   #236
Registered User

Megol's Avatar
Join Date: May 2014
Location: inside the emulator
Posts: 304
In my processor design MOVEM was easier to support than MOVEP. Now that is a dead project, not a complete 68k processor and optimized for high clock speeds (for a FPGA that is) so it may not have been representative. Still:

MOVEM is only complicated in that it uses a special format to indicate registers to store/load. Otherwise it consists of straight stores/loads using increment or decrement mode. This is handled with a sequencer in parallel with the decoder.

MOVEP in comparison require splitting/concatenation of register data, something not used elsewhere in the design. This means either one have to complicate the cache access path or use µops+a temporal register to handle that. It also stores/loads bytes while increasing the address by two so this requires special handling.

In short MOVEP touches more critical spots than MOVEM. For a speed demon design this can be a huge problem.
Megol is offline  
Page generated in 0.03905 seconds with 10 queries