View Single Post
Old 25 April 2015, 19:45   #59
JimDrew
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Lake Havasu City, AZ
Posts: 496
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthey View Post
I understand that the 68060 needs some patching to run MacOS but the ShapeShifter video above shows that the 68060 can outperform the 68040 while being stable. Fusion is not as stable as ShapeShifter on the 68060 but it also works.
That's not the case. First of all the benchmarks shown are slower than a 33MHz 040. Perhaps you are not familiar with FUSION. It is far more stable, more compatible, and hands down faster, than Shapeshifter.


Quote:
The Apollo/Phoenix CPU core has a deeper pipeline, a more parallel advanced design and is highly optimized for the FPGA it is in. The TG68 would need major changes to achieve 68060@50MHz performance.
Perhaps, if TG68 was always going to be used.

Last edited by JimDrew; 25 April 2015 at 19:55.
JimDrew is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.07392 seconds with 9 queries