View Single Post
Old 27 March 2015, 15:07   #10
Unregistered User
demolition's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Copenhagen / DK
Age: 38
Posts: 3,698
Originally Posted by Hewitson View Post
After all these years I still don't know why you'd install something like ClassicWB. A fully-functional WB shouldn't take any more than half an hour to get up and running.
Because I don't really like WB 3.1. I'd much prefer Scalos which ClassicWB is based on in the 020+ versions. Of course one could also install that manually, but ClassicWB has much of the stuff I want, so makes sense to start from there. It would definitely take me a lot longer than half an hour to achieve a reasonable configured WB.
demolition is offline  
Page generated in 0.03894 seconds with 10 queries