English Amiga Board

English Amiga Board (https://eab.abime.net/index.php)
-   Retrogaming General Discussion (https://eab.abime.net/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
-   -   best helicopter flight sim' game? (https://eab.abime.net/showthread.php?t=51027)

lost_lemming 18 February 2010 21:29

best helicopter flight sim' game?
 
Just wondered if there's any other ones besides gunship 2000. not that gunship is bad - but there's gotta be slightly better ones. ?

Predseda 18 February 2010 21:37

No, GS2000 is the best.

Galahad/FLT 18 February 2010 21:38

Thunderhawk

Graham Humphrey 18 February 2010 21:40

Maybe this thread will prove useful...?

Amigajay 18 February 2010 21:56

Gunship 2000 is one of the best though esp on CD32, try Coala as thats a pretty decent game, other than the ones mentioned above thats pretty it as far as Helicopter sims go...

cosmicfrog 18 February 2010 22:18

I was going say Coala but Amigajay beat me to it lol

DDNI 18 February 2010 22:19

GS2000 seems as deadly slow on my 060 as it was on my 020...

Am I mistaken? Or is the chipset / chip RAM the bottleneck?


btw

Graham Humphrey and I reckon Seek and Destroy is the best flight sim of all ;)

Cammy 19 February 2010 02:17

Are you playing the OCS or CD32 version? Perhaps one runs better than the other.

Jonathan Drain 19 February 2010 04:02

I quite liked Zeewolf 2 (or CU Amiga's demo version, anyway).

Predseda 19 February 2010 08:46

Although I love Seek and Destroy and both Zeewolves, I don't think they are helicopter simulations.

tomcat666 19 February 2010 08:49

Definetly Tomahwak on a Spectrum emulator :

http://www.worldofspectrum.org/infos...cgi?id=0005317

Hehe :)

But seriously... GS2000 and Thunderhawk were both great, the second being much more arcadey ofcourse.

TCD 19 February 2010 09:32

I second Gunship 2000. Well, it's almost the only heli sim I played for more than 10 minutes, but that makes it special anyway ;)

FOL 19 February 2010 16:15

Gunship 2000 hands down. Best flight sim ever.

EDIT:- and Thunder Hawk. I think Gunship for intense simulation and Thunder hawk for arcade type action.

Paul_s 22 February 2010 08:41

Apocalypse - damn hard but very nice to play. OK, it ain't a 'sim' :p

FOL 22 February 2010 10:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul_s (Post 644797)
Apocalypse - damn hard but very nice to play. OK, it ain't a 'sim' :p

Thats more like a choplifter (arcade) type game.

Angus 22 February 2010 13:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by DDNI (Post 643863)
GS2000 seems as deadly slow on my 060 as it was on my 020...

Am I mistaken? Or is the chipset / chip RAM the bottleneck?



I found Gunship very playable with on a 1200 certainly 030 upwards. It might be one of those games that benefit from using something like Fastexec to copy the exec library into fast ram (I think that's what it does) which was certainly the case with Star Crusader on an 060 (along with Girv's groovy patch. But I didn't think there was a need for this on GS2000. Now, Tornado AGA or Shuttle, there we could use an improved framerate.

DDNI 22 February 2010 14:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cammy (Post 643944)
Are you playing the OCS or CD32 version? Perhaps one runs better than the other.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angus (Post 644873)
I found Gunship very playable with on a 1200 certainly 030 upwards. It might be one of those games that benefit from using something like Fastexec to copy the exec library into fast ram (I think that's what it does) which was certainly the case with Star Crusader on an 060 (along with Girv's groovy patch. But I didn't think there was a need for this on GS2000. Now, Tornado AGA or Shuttle, there we could use an improved framerate.

I have found that the CD32 version is the most stable and also the one that I found slow.
The AGA version always dumps me out after flicking the red switch to enter cockpit. Today though, I have discovered that if I choose restart from the WHDLoad dump message then the game starts ok. This AGA version is at least 3 times faster than the CD32 version.

Now, I want to know why the AGA dumps me out on the first attempt.

http://download.abime.net/zone/error.jpg

FOL 22 February 2010 21:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by DDNI (Post 644898)
I have found that the CD32 version is the most stable and also the one that I found slow.
The AGA version always dumps me out after flicking the red switch to enter cockpit. Today though, I have discovered that if I choose restart from the WHDLoad dump message then the game starts ok. This AGA version is at least 3 times faster than the CD32 version.

Now, I want to know why the AGA dumps me out on the first attempt.

http://download.abime.net/zone/error.jpg

Am I missing something here??

I found Gunship 2000 on my 1MB A500 / A590 very stable and playable. I enjoyed every second of playing it.

Dastardly 22 February 2010 21:44

I always preferred Thunderhawk.

DDNI 22 February 2010 23:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by FOL (Post 645013)
Am I missing something here??

I found Gunship 2000 on my 1MB A500 / A590 very stable and playable. I enjoyed every second of playing it.

Hi FOL, yes you are missing the AGA chipset and my A1200T that is likely a lil bit more complex 'n' flaky than your stone age A500 ;)


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:14.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Page generated in 0.04686 seconds with 11 queries