English Amiga Board

English Amiga Board (https://eab.abime.net/index.php)
-   Amiga scene (https://eab.abime.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Defender of the Crown - Patching / improving (https://eab.abime.net/showthread.php?t=54376)

ricky500 09 August 2010 16:46

Defender of the Crown - Patching / improving
 
(I hope that this is the right section to post this in)

Here's a crazy idea that I want to put out.

As we all know the Amiga version of Defender of the Crown is missing a lot of features / gameplay elements that were added in ports to other machines most notably the Commodore 64. For instance sword fighting on the Amiga version is just mad clicking while other versions have a method to it. Also another example is in the castle siege, in the Amiga version you can only throw rocks while in other versions you can throw Greek fire and Disease.

Anyways, I was thinking, is there enough interest in the Amiga scene for someone or some people to edit / hack the Amiga version of DOTC to add the missing features that are in other versions of the game? I know that this would be a major undertaking. But I was wondering if there is any interest out there in the Amiga scene for such a project? To me, DOTC, is a monumental part of the Amiga's history, and since this is the 25th anniversary of the Amiga, to me it would be fitting for such a project to be done - a Defender of the Crown Re-Loaded as it where.

Of course it might be easier to take all the pictures, music, etc, and start with fresh code, and re-code the whole game maybe adding AGA support and new features as well.

Well, am I just crazy, or is this a possible project that could actually be done? :)

dirk_the_daring 09 August 2010 16:55

Indeed, that project was already done...
Look for Defender of the crown II for the CDTV/CD32, a remake which vastly improves the amiga original.

TCD 09 August 2010 16:56

IIRC Defender Of The Crown 2 has (all?) the missing features and there's a WHDLoad install for it. Maybe you want to give that a try and see what's still missing?

Edit : What dirk the daring said ;)

ricky500 09 August 2010 21:46

I have played DOTC 2. DOTC 2 is too easy to beat in my opinion - way easier than the original. You start out with enough money to build a big bad army from the get go and then you can just go trounce everybody, and then just beat them down when they pop back up on the map. Plus it takes about 1 1/2 to 2 hours to play though a whole game and there is no save feature. Plus it does not have all the missing features.

TCD 09 August 2010 21:52

So what would your part in the 'patching' be ricky500? Is it just an idea or do you plan to take the major part and only need some additional resources? I guess patching some stuff in the WHDLoad slave *might* be possible, but rewriting/hacking the whole game... don't see that happen.

ricky500 10 August 2010 16:14

Unfortunately, since I'm not much of an Amiga programmer, my part on the project would be limited. :(

I guess that there isn't much of a Amiga programming scene out there like there is for the Commodore 64?

Slayer 12 August 2010 05:59

LOL

When inspiration fails set up a bounty and donate heavily!

When I discovered Warlords II wasn't coming out for the Amiga I called the actual developers/coders of the game and enquired. The coder himself said give me $50,000 and I'll do an Amiga version...

I installed Fusion on my PPC and got hold of the Mac version of Warlords II... I must say however that as far as I'm concerned they completely wrecked Warlords...

All the original needed was a vastly increased AI and a more sensible approach to bonuses or penalties in regards to the presence of individual army groups or terrain...

Some times games do not require much but more fine tuning... A Map Editor could have been good also...

But yikes, I'm running off down the road with my own story than yours, sorry about that ;-)

ricky500 12 August 2010 19:39

I posted about this on Lemon Amiga too - http://www.lemonamiga.com/forum/view...er=asc&start=0

There is interest in making an improved DOTC for the Amiga. Mostly we need a good graphics artist(s) for the project - any volunteers?

skan 12 August 2010 20:06

Just find a coder, let him hack all the missing features you long for into the original game and you're done. Graphics were cool enough IIRC.

TCD 12 August 2010 20:32

Just to make it clear : How big is the 'gap' between DotC2 and the C64 version? I mean which features are missing? The WHDLoad slave is file based, so replacing the graphics and sound/music should be easy enough.

lilalurl 12 August 2010 20:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheCyberDruid (Post 691771)
Just to make it clear : How big is the 'gap' between DotC2 and the C64 version? I mean which features are missing? The WHDLoad slave is file based, so replacing the graphics and sound/music should be easy enough.

I believe that what TCD said makes more "realistic" sense than trying to implement a lot of features in DOTC1.

Things like the starting money in DOTC2, enemy stats etc... should be far easier to find and modify.

Unless of course there is a lot of documentation on DOTC1, its file structure, the compression used for graphics etc....

PS: I always wished for a character with a lightsaber to win all jousting events. Can this be included in the wishlist? ;)

Retro1234 12 August 2010 23:15

DOTC2 is like a enhanced version of DOTC but theres a bug with DOTC2 that I dont think even the WHDload install fixes when you go riading if it the CD-Audio isnt there it doesnt work

Of course works fine from CD with the Audio tracks

TCD 12 August 2010 23:20

Quite sure that could (and should ;)) be fixed in the WHDLoad slave? Is there a bug report on Mantis about this already?

Retro1234 12 August 2010 23:26

Theres a few reports on mantis mainly to do with the controlls-Ive not had this problem
theres is one to do with the problem I mentioned

You can still play without raiding but its a bit crappy :(
http://mantis.whdload.de/view.php?id=504

TCD 12 August 2010 23:31

Hmm, seems like JOTD overlooked that bit. Maybe you should make a new report just with that problem?

tomcat666 13 August 2010 07:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheCyberDruid (Post 691771)
Just to make it clear : How big is the 'gap' between DotC2 and the C64 version? I mean which features are missing? The WHDLoad slave is file based, so replacing the graphics and sound/music should be easy enough.

Actually the Atari ST has all the missing features + some more. There might not be as many colours on the pictures as in the Amiga version but you will be better off getting stuff from that version !

TCD 13 August 2010 09:40

Can someone actually name which features are missing in DOTC2 in comparison to the ST and/or C64 version? Just so that we get an idea how much 'fixing' it would need.

daxb 13 August 2010 10:46

I`m the man behind bugreport http://mantis.whdload.de/view.php?id=1633

Can someone confirm this problem?

Retro1234 13 August 2010 12:30

You can see the differences here

Atari ST - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKDb8-MH08A

Amiga - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvW6okgy4wA

The Amiga Version still seems better to me but strange they left some features out? as the Amiga version was favored.
I like the hitting fire to win raiding -You can still loose ;)

Unless these features are in the game somewhere - Seems like more then just changing some graphics and the ST version would probably have to be dissabled.

Help! -:) Im still unsure of where to aim of the Amiga version jousting -You can see in the Amiga longplay they manged.

Quote:

Originally Posted by daxb (Post 691928)
I`m the man behind bugreport http://mantis.whdload.de/view.php?id=1633

Can someone confirm this problem?

ill try and test it -can you confirm the raiding problem?

Retro1234 13 August 2010 16:36

1 Attachment(s)
DOTC ST version running under 68000 Medusa

No sound a few corrupt graphics, have to have a better look


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:50.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Page generated in 0.05434 seconds with 11 queries