Pacomix 2 - Editor
 

Heya guys,

I've come across a really strange issue tonight and no idea how to fix... I've spent the last hour or so trying to resolve but :crying

I wanted to try the game Pacomix 2 :agree

Grabbed the archive from Aminet...

If I extract into my "ClassicWB Lite 3.1" .HDF then all good :great

If I create a self-booting / bare-bones .HDF or even install a standard "Workbench 3.1" .HDF and extract the files, then the "Editor" won't load :banghead :banghead :banghead

I've used "SnoopDOS" and loaded the "Editor" on my "ClassicWB Lite 3.1" .HDF and there are no dependencies:

https://i.imgur.com/FildyQt.png

I'm really at a loss how to get the "Editor" to work? Never seen anything like this before that I haven't been able to solve...

Help!!! :help :help :help

Seems that an AGA (020+) machine with 16 colors WB is required.

But you have to test :)

Many thanks ross; I'll try tonight.

Guess the standard Workbench 3.1 install is set to 4, 8 colours or something...

...not sure how I'll set 16 colours on a bare-bones .HDF though; which is really without any OS files.

Thanks for the tip ross about the number of colours; never would have thought about that...

The "Editor" works fine with 8 colours set :great

Hmmm, now I need to make a decision about what .HDF to use:

• Standard Workbench 3.1 install + Pacomix 2 (all files) + 8 colours set.
• Bare-bones + Pacomix 2 (no Editor).

The game is only for AGA
you just have one library on libs: reqtools.library
Game and editor work with generic slave

I know the game is AGA only :rolleyes

I don't want to use WHDLoad or any generic slave.

Preferably, I'm going to use a bare-bones .HDF i.e. no OS files except "Assign" and "LoadWB".

The game works fine without any library files. It's just the "Editor" that doesn't work.

...and ross has found the reason why; you need at least 8 colours set.

I know, you hate whdload
It's just for saying that the game and the editor work, it's an indice for solving problem perhaps

Sorry, after test, I confirm that the game no needing library. After my test when i'm booting directly with winuae (no whdload), the editor work only if I use a startup-sequence. If I not use startup-sequence, editor don't work

That's not true at all; I don't hate WHDLoad.

I prefer to use native installs with emulation as I don't have uber hardware configured and games run without crazy amounts of RAM. I try as much as possible to keep things stock.

Example for WHDLoad; how much memory does your "generic" onEscapee require? From memory you need at least 32MB Fast and you probably still get screen flashing...

Native; 2MB Chip & 4MB Fast RAM is more than sufficient.

That's not true either.

ross has already found the reason why it doesn't work; you need at least 8 colours set. It's that simple.

I'm not use any workbench prefs to set 8 colours in my test. but cool that Ross have solved problem

My real amiga have 256 Mo Ram since 10 years

But I'm ok with you, for large games it's just a proof of concept like an emulator in an emulator

Ok, but what have you installed on? A standard Workbench 3.1 install with nothing added / changed?

Good for you ;)

It is possible to copy the screenmode.prefs from a wb install to a barebone hdf. That should be enough to set a 8 colour screen. I'm not sure what loads the .prefs file either the monitor file in devs or iprefs iirc.

just with "editor" on my startup-sequence, for me, that work in winuae (ks3.1). I have no prefs or devs folders for this game

That's what I hoped :agree

Tried that (and a few other things), didn't work unfortunately :sad

I also copied "SYS:Prefs/Screenmode" to the bare-bones .HDF just in case.

I didn't copy the monitor files though from under "Devs". Might try that, thanks ;)

Can you test? (editor)

/edit hdf test removed

Yes that works; I really have no idea why though?

Interestingly; if I use your .HDF, go into the "Amiga Early Start Control", select "Boot With No Startup-Sequence" and then type "Editor" at the CLI; then it doesn't work...

My bare-bones .HDF has a "Startup-Sequence" which is as follows:

test with no loadwb perhaps, for me initially i had setpatch and assign env in my startup, and that working too

...but I need "LoadWB" so you can select one of the following:

• Pacomix2
• Editor
• Pac2-readme

I don't really want to get rid of the icons. I mean, I can write a menu that runs either of these by pressing F1, F2 or F3 from CLI but... this would be just the same as if running without a "Startup-Sequence" so probably won't work.

This whole situation just seems really weird; and setting 8 colours instead of 4 colours fixes that in a "standard Workbench 3.1" install.

I really don't understand how running only "Editor" from a "Startup-Sequence" works fine but if using "LoadWB" from a "standard Workbench 3.1" install (unless you set 8 colours) or "barebones" .HDF doesn't :crazy

Damien, can you give me a link to your HDF?

Sure, which one though my friend?

• Standard Workbench 3.1 install (with only default 4 colours set) [Editor doesn't work].
• Standard Workbench 3.1 install (with 8 colours set) [Editor works now].
• Bare-bones [Editor doesn't work].