MAME.net's just been redecorated

[MethodGit]

So, what do you guys think about the new design? ;)

A very refreshing sight IMHO. I guess this is to prepare for the new year, perhaps.

[RCK]

It's more professionnal, not bad.

[7-Zark-7]

Though the look might've improved,what's more important is how are the latest versions of MAME 32 (Win 98 friendly version, not the DOS version), improved?

Are they as stable & fast as 036final was? What sort of CPU grunt in necessary now, will a Celeron 900 be sufficient??

[MethodGit]

I prefer MAME32 to the Windows console version (the one without a GUI, like the DOS version) because it seems to run games in better quality, plus it doesn't adopt some dumb fixed resolution which makes the game look ridiculous. :rolleyes

[oldpx]

I'm posting only negative comments today, I don't know why but here it goes:

Mame suxxx dixxxx...no maybe that's too harsh..
If mame wasn't emulating nearly everything, I don't think I'd keep in on my HD. dos version forces 60hz on any screenmode so it's impossible to use it for me and mame32 runs *all* the games worser than any other emulator, if the game can be emulated at all. It's not always about the speed but you get a cheap feeling somehow.It doesnt't have nice looking blending modes for gfx and afaik, it cannot save and load memory states can it?

[MethodGit]

AFAIK the team are currently working on "memory save states" as we speak.

[Akira]

The site looks a bit better, but no bananas.